Labor Day is Our Day
September 3, 2012 7:26 am
By: Jeffrey R. Boxer, Publisher
“In the future days, which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms.
The first is freedom of speech and expression — everywhere in the world.
The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way — everywhere in the world.
The third is freedom from want — which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants — everywhere in the world.
The fourth is freedom from fear — which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor — anywhere in the world.”
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
When I started Unionosity, my goal was to provoke discussion about important workplace and economic issues. Work is such a significant part of our lives – many of us spend the majority of our waking hours at it. Yet we don’t talk enough about what it means and how we can do it better — specifically, what can be accomplished if we work together.
Unfortunately, the “working together” part can sometimes go awry before it has the chance to begin. I’ve learned to be mindful of some of the predicaments that the working poor have long lived with. One of these I learned the hard way during an affordable housing campaign I took part in nearly 20 years ago in South Central Los Angeles. The program we were organizing around — ironically, a Jack Kemp HUD program — would transfer ownership of publicly subsidized housing to tenant groups made up of Section 8 voucher recipients, essentially giving people ownership over where they lived. Virtually everyone we spoke to saw the great benefits of the program.
Yet the would-be beneficiaries of the program refused to participate and the campaign failed. Despite generalized support for the idea, the people we spoke to would not join in because they couldn’t envision themselves remaining where they were for long enough to benefit from it. Almost to a person, they gave the same explanation: “That’s great for everyone else, but I’ll have a new job/opportunity/start by next year.” Despite the sad fact that almost every one of them would be in the exact same place next year – and in even worse economic shape – they were paralyzed by even thinking about this economic reality. The hope of a better tomorrow was keeping them from a better today.
Labor Day is the day we summon the collective will to honor the day in, day out labor that keeps this economy working. For union people, it is our day. Yet in 2012, on the cusp of a key Presidential election and after 30 years of policy favoring top-down economics created to benefit the rich and widen the gap between the haves and have-nots, economic freedoms and the right to unionize are far from secure in the United States (and worse than not secure in many states).
Given the continuing emergency level of unemployment throughout the country and the dire economic position many of us find ourselves in, one would reasonably expect that the general public would rise up and demand that something be done, now. The erosion of the middle class, occurring in lockstep with the lowering of union representation density, would appear to be a natural first item on the agenda.
But as we’ve seen over and over, Americans often behave opposite of their economic interests. Organizations (read: unions) that support the cause of equality, the leveling of the playing field, and accountability from the most powerful are forced to spend valuable time defending their existence from proposals designed to destroy their effectiveness, instead of using that time to advocate for economic opportunity.
This is about more than just the difficulties that would-be union members confront when wanting to join or form a union. Much of it is because the economic rights protected by the law are in shabby repair – or go largely unenforced while unions are required to fight back against anti-union legislation (such as Prop 32) and other hurdles concocted by those with the most to gain from a lopsided economic system.
It is also because there are so many people – like those people I spoke to on the affordable housing campaign – living in an illusion of impending prosperity – the “one day I’ll be a winner in the casino economy and join the 1%” dream. The counterfactual support – by those that don’t benefit from it – of laws and taxation protecting the wealth and power of a tiny percentage of the population, is in order to avoid confronting the miserable reality that their lives will not improve without effective collective action. Yet this illusion is so powerful that many cannot confront the reality that they – we, collectively – are sinking.
To be clear, those in the grip of the prosperity illusion understand exactly how bad the economy is for them and those around them. The prosperity illusion isn’t about them not getting it. It is about them not being able to go forward if they don’t believe things are going to change for them – even if that means refusing policies and programs that would help them because it would require them to accept that they will never be the success they dream of being. And the prosperity illusion is exactly what Republicans peddle.
If the Republican National Convention conveyed anything other than the GOP’s empty chair policies and politics, it is that the casino economy snake oil is still a potion that works to scare and divert people from their collective interest in economic polices that promote fairness. But the snake oil of fake economic opportunity cannot be effectively countered by the castor oil of bitter economic reality. Progressives can’t win with a campaign or policies that require our would-be citizen supporters to recognize their unfortunate and – if things don’t change – likely permanent plight. People need hope, and the very word “progressive” implies moving forward, onward and upward, improved. Our platform and policies must emphasize how we can change what is economically possible, and it is only through durable institutions that represent values and interests of economic improvement and fairness that we can capture the imaginations of those who would stand with us.
And those institutions are unions.
It is a fundamental question about the kind of world we want to live in: a fragmented, freelance society where insecurity is the new normal, or one that addresses the risks inherent in a world that creates insecure careers, and attempts to find solutions for economic security. The choice is ours.
Image from here